2023 Software Developer Test Cases South Carolina Department of Revenue #1 Test Case Steven and Sue are residents of SC and file a joint federal return. They filed an extension for their federal return. Steven and Sue are currently living in Ontario, Canada. They are both over age 65. Steven’s date of birth is April 21, 1957, and Sue’s date of birth is July 13, 1955. They have federal taxable income of $680,000 Both taxpayers are retired military. Steven received $50,000 of military retirement income. Steven also received surviving spouse retirement income of $15,000. His deceased wife’s date of birth was May 14, 1954. Steven receives a separate retirement income and treats it as a lump sum distribution on the federal return, resulting in the use of the SC4972 and tax reported on line 7 of $200. Sue received military retirement income of $6,000 and other retirement income of $16,000. She also received surviving spouse military retirement income of $24,000 from her former husband whose date of birth was August 1, 1943. Together Steven and Sue had taxable social security of $16,600. Steven receives interest income of $1000 from the state of NJ that was not included in federal taxable income. He also receives interest of $1,800 from US treasury bonds. Steven is a shareholder in an S Corporation. He was able to take a QBI deduction of $75,000 on the federal return. On the South Carolina return, he has $300,000 of active trade or business income, which results in active trade or business income tax of $9,000. Steven and Sue made contributions to the SC College Investment Program of $33,000. They also paid $1,000 for an annual contract for identity theft protection. During 2023, they are reporting tax on excess withdrawals from a Catastrophe Savings Account of $60. Steven and Sue both have South Carolina earned income and qualify for the maximum two wage earner credit. Steven and Sue purchased solar panels qualifying for the credit on TC 38 for their‐ home in South Carolina. The panels cost $50,000. Steven had $2,800 SC withholding from his 1099R. Sue had $400 SC withholding from the 1099R she received as a surviving spouse. The couple made estimated tax payments for 2023 of $28,000. They also made a $4,000 extension payment in April 2024. Steven and Sue want to contribute $700 of their overpayment to the checkoff for the SC Department of Archives and History. They wish to receive their refund by direct deposit. |
#2 Test Case John is a full year‐ resident of South Carolina for 2023 who files as HOH on his federal return. He has one dependent on his federal return. His dependent, a daughter Tracie, was born June 27, 2022 John’s federal taxable income is $32,800 John is a full time firefighter and is eligible for a subsistence allowance for 60 days. He serves in the National Guard and is able to deduct his nontaxable pay of $4,500. On his federal return he deducted $640 of travel expenses related to his National Guard Service. John also serves as a volunteer state constable and earned the required 240 service time hours during 2023. John was allowed an EITC on his federal return of $100. He also had $2,000 of expenses that qualified for the federal credit for child and dependent care. He has SC withholding from a W2 of $385. John would like for his overpayment to be applied as follows: $60 to Use Tax, $100 to 2024 Estimated Tax, and $102 by paper check. #3 Test Case Sweet Shoppe, LLC, an S Corporation, is filing a composite return on behalf of its nonresident shareholders. The composite return is filed using the FEIN of the entity. The composite return is reporting total South Carolina taxable income of $98,070 and a composite tax liability of $4,850. The S Corporation had tax withheld per 1099s of $2,500 and NR sale of real estate withholding of $3,400. The return is requesting the refund be issued by paper check. #4 – Test Case Eric is a SC resident filing as married filing separately for federal purposes. He has federal taxable income of $136,200. Eric receives a ‐ K 1 from a family partnership that conducts all its business in South Carolina. He claims two sons, Daniel and David, as dependents on his federal return. Daniel’s date of birth is October 17, 2005, and David’s date of birth is October 10, 2011. Eric was a teacher for part of the year, and had $400 in Classroom Teacher Expenses that qualify for a South Carolina credit. Eric became totally and permanently disabled during the year and received disability retirement income of $21,000. Eric pays the tuition for Daniel’s college education and is eligible for a South Carolina tuition tax credit of $1,500. Eric is also eligible for a $4,000 Parental Refundable Credit on the I 361 for ‐ David’s private school tuition. Eric has a balance due on his return. |
#5 – Test Case Clara is a SC resident filing an amended return to claim the Preceptor Credit. She is an advanced practice registered nurse. At her practice, 50% of the patients are Medicaid insured,‐ Medicare insured,‐ and self pay.‐ She served 6 rotations as a preceptor. Clara’s original return was filed using the qualifying surviving spouse filing status. Her 12 year old step‐ ‐ granddaughter, Stacie, is her dependent. Stacie’s date of birth is June 30, 2011. Clara is over age 65 with her birthdate being May 20, 1957. Clara timely filed her original return with a balance due of which she has only paid $100. Her original return reported a negative federal taxable income of ($1,770). She itemized her deductions on her federal return. Clara’s Schedule A reported itemized deductions of: line 4 medical expenses $1,800 line 5a state and local income taxes $2,500 line 5b state and local real estate taxes $6,875 line 5c state and local personal property taxes $625 line 8 home mortgage interest $8,600 line 11 gifts by cash or check $10,550 for total itemized deductions on line 17 of $30,950. Clara received a 1099G/INT from SCDOR in the year 2023 reporting a state refund of $600. This amount was in Clara’s federal taxable income. Clara receives retirement income of $8,000. Clara has a rental home in VA with income of $13,000 and a rental property in NC with a rental loss of $145,000. She sold stock that was held for ten years with a gain of $1,400. She is a partner in a SC partnership that operates as a milk dairy. She receives a K 1 reporting ‐ $148,000 of income to her. She is eligible for the refundable Milk Credit of $5,000 and the Anhydrous Ammonia Credit of $75. Clara is paying a $50 Penalty for underpayment of Estimated Tax. The amended SC1040 has a balance due of $67. #6 – Test Case Joseph files his federal return as Single and claims the standard deduction. He is under age 65. He is a nonresident of South Carolina who earns wages for services he performs in South Carolina. The only income Joseph receives is from a W 2 ‐ reporting SC wages of $60,000. The W 2 reports ‐ $2,540 of SC tax withheld. Joseph is requesting his refund by direct deposit. |